The meeting w/ Mr. G went well today.
I still have no idea if we’re going to launch the class…but the dIs proposal is on the right track.
Before I finish my lit review, and draft of the chapter outline…I’ve got to come up with a good title (not for the dIs, but for the class). I’ve got a feeling that, following the old Martin Diamond rule – my faculty adviser will be impressed and seek “impact” funding for the class only when he is sure I have a snappy title. Martin Diamond was a smart man, excellent writer – and his work always had great titles. I don’t mind following his guidance second hand through Mr. G.
Wrote several letters for students today. No sentence fragments in those – I hope…
No time to listen to the confirmation hearings today. I felt like crying.
Larry’s computer is messed up so no mixdown tonight. There’s a reason why I haven’t mentioned new band names lately…
At some point, when I’ve done a bit more reading – I want to talk about some of the non-canonical gospels. Here’s something that’s more mind-blowing to me than any of the so-called revelations that can be found in Gnostic works or other “secret stories” of Jesus: - there are two Apocalypses of St. Peter. Now that’s working overtime. You write one apocalypse and say: “That’s not good enough – I’d better write a second.” I do not know enough about the early church or the canonization process to say anything all that intelligent about this stuff…I do know that later authors wrote such gospels in the name of a famous person, so St. Peter probably didn’t write these things.
I was drawn to these books by the name - St. Peter (or at least what St. Peter represents in the history of the Church) is a hero to me. I am not a theologian, and I often rely on some pretty shaky knowledge of how “who got to be what” in the Catholic Church – but it interests me that:
A.) St. Peter is the first leader of the Apostolic church on Earth established by Christ
B.) The further one goes in the (canonical) Acts of the Apostles – stories about St. Peter begin to (this is the wrong way of phrasing it) – take a back seat to what’s going on with St. Paul.
C.) A book where the man some believe to be the first Pope speaks (again second-hand) of his understanding of the end of the age – and Christ’s words to St. Peter about redemption is considered by some of the early church fathers to be heretical (I think that was the 2nd Apocalypse of St. Peter which the Gnostics lugged around with them…) and the 1st Apocalypse which, for lack of a better term, didn’t bake the final cut of the New Testament.
Maybe this is just a testament to the ignorance of ed…
Add these observations to the list of things I don’t know.
There was some junk about these things on the History Channel or something - which is weird because I was reading about one of the Apocalypses of St. Peter a few days ago? Is this the crushing hand of fate?
Sorry Bruce Springsteen.
I’m going to be spending time (maybe even here) writing about John Adams, his theoretical works and their political consequences so I just wanted to say something about something else…before I commit to uh, whatever…
Maybe that’s the title of the Adams class: “The Theoretical Works of John Adams and their Political Consequences”…
MARTIN DIAMOND – WHY HAVE YOU FORSAKEN ME???!!!