This election gives me chills…and not the usual ‘oh fucking shit not this elephant-sized donkey show’ chills.
Well, there’s some of that.
In the wake of the inflammatory comments from the Rev (whose name needs not to be googled here, or googled and lead to here, the place of the e-damned)….
In the wake of Rev Wrong’s fucked excuse for what passes for rhetoric (in the deservingly pejorative sense) and resembles the kind of rhetoric I recognize (remember, I used to work at fucking university where all sorts of sub-moronic, fire and brimstone, liberal speechifyin' on the sins and shortcomings of America passes for intellectual discourse)…
But following the kind of speech that arises too often in American political life – mindless invectives thrown about carelessly (the way some American presidents lob cruise missiles)
….uh, ooops – I think I am guilty of the same shit.
Well, I never said I wasn’t a hypocrite, did I?
But the speeches and writing in the aftermath remind me why I love studying speeches, political writing, and political stories.
I won’t use this as an occasion to talk about race in America. Everybody can offer an opinion on this, some less worthless than others…mine being somewhere in-between sort of worthless and totally fucking worthless….
Perhaps Senator Obama would say I missed the point, but besides thanking me for my vote in the primary, I’m sure we would not have much to talk about and I’m cool with that.
I’m missing the point again, aren’t I?
I am enthralled by Obama’s speech (much of which I disagree with) - - The American Revolution is “incomplete”??? Yeah - says you Senator! You can call whatever we are engaged in now the pursuit of God’s justice or the great quest of equality for all in a diverse society but saying that the American Revolution is incomplete is to fundamentally misunderstand and diminish it.
I’m sure nobody finds that statement caustic since, well who gives a fuck about the American Revolution or how it is defined in (not through) time?!
There was something more important that happened in Senator Obama’s speech. He writes his story into the election, into America, now and forever. Yes, that has been a theme of his candidacy which, while lacking substance on issues from time to time, has never been short on narrative. And we who support him are hungry for those sorts of words, and something like an American narrative that inspires us or at least sounds less insipid than the narrative of politicians we hear from time to time.
By time to time I mean basically We the People get someone or some story like this every 40 or 50 years if we are fucking lucky.
You may say “Ed how can you say you support this fucking guy and say you love the narrative when, in the same stinky breath, you say that he’s short on substance?!?! Things are going to shit in America! We need someone with policies! Ya can’t eat narrative!!!”
To which I say, “Fair point, but try telling Steven King that.”
- ok, that's probably less narrative, and more books by the pound –
A more serious response might be the following – there are those who have taken an interest in the old, beloved and probably equally reviled curmudgeon John Adams and to a greater extent – the founding generation. I knew, although am still surprised, that it was coming when my dear friend Bill Garver (who is always 15 minutes ahead of the rest of us) read thoughtful books, and collected significant numbers original writings from America’s founding generation.
At first I thought he was embarking on some sort of creepy treasure hunt, but he assured me I was out of my head.
For us, the American public, the Latest Generation who claim to care about the founders – let’s hear their policies. What were their stances on the day to day, serious economic issues of their times beyond "I'm fer the National Bank" or "I'm Aginnn the National Bank"? We don’t fucking know, and we don’t fucking care. We care about their stories and aside from Adams, Madison and Hamilton the rest of the founders did NOT write in-depth political treatises…there thought if accessible at all are through letters and biographies.
Those who wish can have Thomas Paine. Seriously, you can have him. I wouldn't waste much more than these few, poorly constructed sentences on a Paine and not because he was an avowed Deist. His writings, with very few exceptions read like an angry, rambling 18th Century blog.
BLECHHH!
I could go one but no one is going to waste the time and brainspace I did comparing Paine's Rights of Man to Burke's Reflections on the Revolution in France. Let me just suggest that the latter is as much a testament to a great man's understanding of where the danger truly lies in politics as it is testament to the power of the English language, while the former reads like a bunch of MUMBO JUMBO BULLSHIT!!!!
I'm not saying the expression of the rights of man is mumbo jumbo bullshit, just Paine's spasmodic, jerk-off behind a dumpster prose style employed in the work. Hey, if I ever need a guest writer for this blog, Thomas Paine could fill in and no one would notice.
Jefferson only got to write the Declaration because Adams pawned it off on him, an action that I’m sure made Adams beat his head against the wall a la the Raging Bull.
Leaf through the rest of Jefferson’s writings. I wouldn’t be surprised if he wrote as much (directly) about botany as he wrote about the American regime or whatever he was a part of creating.
I think I started this post off by decrying over-the-top statements and have fallen prey to all that I sought to criticize. That may be the most American story yet.
Sorry.
But the part of Obama’s speech where he writes himself into the American story, and into this very present tension this is the kind of thing that America’s founders tried to do. They were viewed by some of their contemporary critics as preying on the lowest instincts of the people, trying to build on their passions their hatred of kings and distain of authority. And today they are revered by us for espousing views considered my many of the time, to be worthy only of the rabble.
What can Obama inspire or build? I think it would be foolish to say that it will rise to the accomplishments of the patron saints of our American political religion (it was Lincoln, by the way who said law abidingness ought to be the civic or political religion of this place) THOSE DAMNED REPUBLICANS, ALWAYS THROWING RELIGION IN OUR FACES, stupid Lincoln
- - - but what Obama’s done is taken a low controversy surrounding his minister and the church where he was married and baptized his kids…
- he’s taken the day-to-day political tripe that drags down many…and turned it into beautiful words, deepening both his story and his example.
There are thoughtful critics who have returned worthy and appropriate rhetorical fire at the Illinois Senator currently running for president. I am thinking now about Charles Krauthammer’s piece in The Washington Post. He described Obama’s speech from Tuesday as “an elegantly crafted, brilliantly sophistic justification of that scandalous dereliction” – the dereliction was in what, I guess ought to be Obama’s duty to denounce his pastor.
I think Krauthammer has a point insofar as part of us expects our leaders and really everyone to denounce wrong and inflammatory speech when we hear it.
I think Krauthammer has a point in saying to Obama that it is hard to claim that his campaign transcends the fears of the past (embodied by the old preacher on his way out) and still expose his children to that old, destructive rhetoric.
But doing what Krauthammer would have him do would cheat us out of the real rhetorical, political and almost poetic beauty of Obama’s speech and candidacy. He puts himself, politically, personally and racially in the middle of the controversy. Instead of denouncing the minister or steeling his resolve against critics he offers empathy to those who feel racial tension in America. There are many (I have been known to say this from time to time) that say empathetic appeals are pretty low. Obama uses his words, his story, (and I may regret writing this but seriously, who is reading at this point??) even his very skin to show that the anger and frustration in American are part of his constitution.
This kind of shit is so much more worth my time than “I feel your pain.”